ANDREWMAPL PROFILE

AndrewMapl's avatar
0 ratings
  • AndrewMapl
  • Popularity: 0 points
  • Activity: 29 points
  • Age: 34
  • Gender: Female
  • Relation: Taken
  • Interested: Girls
  • Joined: 3066 days ago
  • Last Login: 3013 days ago
  • Profile viewed: 759 times
  • Has watched: 0 videos
  • People have watched AndrewMapl videos: 0 times

CONTACT ANDREWMAPL

MORE INFO ABOUT AndrewMapl


BLOG

IEA Bookshop
Views: 261 · Added: 3018 days ago

http://media2.picsearch.com/is?hRFqcL_tM84EEjqUDav2gYYaKhKjxTf8VrJFrOPzhxo&height=228Learn how sustainable energy from the Greek elements - Earth, Air, Fire and Water - can replace nonrenewable fuel sources and nuclear power.

West - you got it right. Some of us have actually dug into the scary things greens put out about nuclear power, and like the Google research into renewables, their claims do not work out. Pencil out the human injury and death from each source of power and nuclear comes out far exceptional. The US Navy saw through bogus green fear mongering sixty years back and has not looked back because.

Understanding neg-entropy is very important due to the fact that various energy sources do not have the same negentropy density by any methods. In specific, the renewables such as wind, solar, wave etc. are typically are far more dis-ordered at the source. This makes it fundamentally very tough to cost efficiently harvest renewable energy.

West's last comment is also on target. The energy source that has far and away the greatest neg-entropy is nuclear. In the 1950s the forecast was that atomic energy would be too inexpensive to meter", and on a thermodynamic basis that must still be true. The bulk of the expense of nuclear power lies in satisfying safety and environmental policies.

In the exact same exact way, coal power is utilized to provide power to develop solar batteries, which in turn gradually supply the power back to the grid over 30 years. After 30 years (when the solar batteries breaks) your net return is in fact unfavorable.

I question if there isn't really some sort of physical or economic law at work here? There must be a direct relationship in between energy density and economic value, right? It seems that it would be directed related to entropy - after a specific level of diffusion all energy sources are uneconomic, with economic" just being a measure of energy gain over time.

Now, the bad news. They will certainly likewise NOT be charging either! Due to the fact that they are in constantly filled up line moving slowly forward at irregular periods.), ( Nor will certainly they discharging their batteries (ie, warming their interiors and motorists while waiting in the snow and ice half the year, or running their ac system the h other half the year.http://media2.picsearch.com/is?hRFqcL_tM84EEjqUDav2gYYaKhKjxTf8VrJFrOPzhxo&height=228